Molecular Inflammatory, Oxidative Stress, and Angiogenic Pathways in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Pathogenesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors

  • Nimra Asghar COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan Author
  • Zuha Tariq COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan Author
  • Minahil Tahir COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan Author
  • Fatima Ali COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan Author
  • Muhammad Akram University of Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Ejaz Ehsan Khan University of Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Khaleeq Ullah University of Florence, Italy Author

Keywords:

Diabetic Foot, Diabetes Mellitus, Wound Healing, Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, Angiogenesis, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Malondialdehyde

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a serious health condition in diabetes mellitus and a primary reason of non-traumatic amputations of lower-limb worldwide. This study aimed to investigate the combined effect of inflammation, oxidative stress, and pathological angiogenic pathways in DFU. Methods: The extensive literature search included the use of PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus, from 2019 to 2025. Researches based on human subjects with DFUs were incorporated when they have quantitative data of inflammatory, oxidative stress or angiogenic biomarkers. Studies conducted in animal, or in vitro studies, and those without quantitative data were excluded. Funnel plot symmetry and Newcastle-Ottowa scale (NOS-adapted) was used to determine publication bias and risk of bias respectively. Results: Total seven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and meta-analyses were done in terms of a random-effects inverse-variance model. DFU pooled analyses showed significantly higher tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) (SMD = 3.52; 95% CI: 2.22-4.83, p = 0.0001) and malondialdehyde (MDA) (SMD = 3.07; 95% CI: 1.67-4.48, p = 0.0001) levels in DFU when compared with controls whereas, the pooled analyses of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) suggested similar pattern between the compared groups (SMD = 0.39; 95% CI: - 3.41 to 4.19, p = 0.84). Substantial heterogeneity was found (I2 > 90%). There was moderate risk of bias among included studies and certainty of evidence was also moderate according to GRADE assessment.  Conclusion: High TNF-α and MDA concentrations could be utilized as molecular predictors for risk stratification by DFU and disease severity. 

Author Biographies

  • Nimra Asghar, COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Department of Biosciences

  • Zuha Tariq, COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Department of Biosciences

  • Minahil Tahir, COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Department of Biosciences

  • Fatima Ali, COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Department of Biosciences

  • Muhammad Akram, University of Lahore, Pakistan

    Department of Pathology

  • Ejaz Ehsan Khan, University of Lahore, Pakistan

    Department of Pathology 

  • Khaleeq Ullah, University of Florence, Italy

    Department of Pathology

References

1. Wang X, Yuan CX, Xu B, Yu Z. Diabetic foot ulcers: classification, risk factors and management. World J Diabetes. 2022;13(12):1049. https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v13.i12.1049

2. Akkus G, Sert M. Diabetic foot ulcers: a devastating complication of diabetes mellitus continues non-stop in spite of new medical treatment modalities. World J Diabetes. 2022;13(12):1106. https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v13.i12.1106

3. Gong H, Ren Y, Li Z, Zha P, Bista R, Li Y, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors of lower extremity amputation in diabetic inpatients with foot ulcers. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1144806. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1144806.

4. Huang X, Li Z, Zhai Z, Wang Q, Wei R, Mo J, et al. Association between metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and MACCEs in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: an ambispective longitudinal cohort study. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2024;17:1119–1130. https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S447897

5. Deng H, Li B, Shen Q, Zhang C, Kuang L, Chen R, et al. Mechanisms of diabetic foot ulceration: a review. J Diabetes. 2023;15(4):299–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.13372

6. Mykhaylichenko V, Kaibov I, Bondarenko N, Parshin D, Puchkina G. Characteristics of immunoreactivity in patients with various forms of diabetic foot ulcer. Archiv Euromedica. 2022;12(3):17. https://doi.org/10.35630/2199-885X/2022/12/3.17

7. González P, Lozano P, Ros G, Solano F. Hyperglycemia and oxidative stress: an integral, updated and critical overview of their metabolic interconnections. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(11):9352. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119352

8. Xiong Y, Chu X, Yu T, Knoedler S, Schroeter A, Lu L, et al. Reactive oxygen species-scavenging nanosystems in the treatment of diabetic wounds. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;12(25):2300779. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202300779

9. Rai V, Moellmer R, Agrawal DK. Stem cells and angiogenesis: implications and limitations in enhancing chronic diabetic foot ulcer healing. Cells. 2022;11(15):2287. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11152287

10. Goswami AG, Basu S, Huda F, Pant J, Ghosh Kar A, Banerjee T, et al. An appraisal of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF): the dynamic molecule of wound healing and its current clinical applications. Growth Factors. 2022;40(3–4):73–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/08977194.2022.2074843

11. Xu J, Gao J, Li H, Zhu Z, Liu J, Gao C. The risk factors in diabetic foot ulcers and predictive value of prognosis of wound tissue vascular endothelium growth factor. Scientific Reports. 2024;14(1):14120. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64009-4

12. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

13. Fekete JT, Győrffy B. MetaAnalysisOnline.com: web-based tool for the rapid meta-analysis of clinical and epidemiological studies. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27:e64016. https://doi.org/10.2196/64016

14. Carra MC, Romandini P, Romandini M. Risk of bias evaluation of cross-sectional studies: adaptation of the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. J Periodontal Res. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.13405

15. Shao SC, Kuo LT, Huang YT, Lai PC, Chi CC. Using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) to rate the certainty of evidence of study outcomes from systematic reviews: a quick tutorial. Dermatol Sin. 2023;41(1):3–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/ds.DS-D-22-00154

16. Maier M, VanderWeele TJ, Mathur MB. Using selection models to assess sensitivity to publication bias: a tutorial and call for more routine use. Campbell Syst Rev. 2022;18(3):e1256. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1256

17. Al-Khalidi AAK, Hatem RM. Assessment of immunological biomarkers in diabetic patients with and without foot ulcers. Int J Basic Appl Sci. 2025;14(7):88–96. https://doi.org/10.14419/3dypmj38

18. Wang S, Gao L, Qin X, Li T, Wang J, Xie H. The prognostic and diagnostic significance of inflammatory markers TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-γ in evaluating disease severity in diabetic foot infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025;15:1606612. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1606612

19. Guo H, Xue Z, Mei S, Li T, Yu H, Ning T, et al. Clinical efficacy of antibiotic-loaded bone cement and negative pressure wound therapy in multidrug-resistant organism diabetic foot ulcers: a retrospective analysis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025;14:1521199. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2024.1521199

20. Dhamodharan U, Karan A, Sireesh D, Vaishnavi A, Somasundar A, Rajesh K, et al. Tissue-specific role of Nrf2 in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers during hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Free Radic Biol Med. 2019;138:53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.04.031

21. Nyamadzawo AT, Nishio J, Ogawa T, Okada S. Relationship between oxidative stress and severity of diabetic foot ulcers among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan: a cross-sectional study. Health Sci Rep. 2025;8(7):e70935. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70935

22. Sangeeta S, Siripuram C, Konka S, Vaithilingam K, Periasamy P, Velu RK, et al. Biomarkers of inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction in early detection of diabetic foot ulcers. Cureus. 2025;17(4):e82174. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.82174

23. Abd El-Khalik SR, Hafez YM, Elkholy RA. The role of circulating soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 in patients with diabetic foot ulcer: a possible mechanism of pathogenesis via a novel link between oxidative stress, inflammation and angiogenesis. Microvasc Res. 2020;130:103987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2020.103987.

24. Rashad N, Khalil U, Elshamy A, Nawara AM. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of tumor necrosis factor-α serum and mRNA expression in patients with infected diabetic foot ulcers. Zagazig Univ Med J. 2024;30(1):65–75. https://doi.org/10.21608/zumj.2023.226201.2835

25. Musale V, Wasserman DH, Kang L. Extracellular matrix remodelling in obesity and metabolic disorders. Life Metab. 2023;2(4):load021. https://doi.org/10.1093/lifemeta/load021

26. Worsley AL, Lui DH, Ntow-Boahene W, Song W, Good L, Tsui J. The importance of inflammation control for the treatment of chronic diabetic wounds. Int Wound J. 2023;20(6):2346–2359. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14048

27. Deng L, Wang G, Ju S. Correlation between inflammatory factors, autophagy protein levels, and infection in granulation tissue of diabetic foot ulcer. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024;12(4):e1233. https://doi.org/10.1002/iid3.1233

28. Memon SR, Brohi GH, Memon FR, Shahani MY, Memon S. Study on red cell distribution width, haematocrit and red blood corpuscle (RBC) indices as early markers for the detection of coronary artery disease: a case control study. Prof Med J. 2019;26(12):2075–2079. https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2019.26.12.3069

29. Dri E, Lampas E, Lazaros G, Lazarou E, Theofilis P, Tsioufis C, et al. Inflammatory mediators of endothelial dysfunction. Life. 2023;13(6):1420. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13061420

30. Nirenjen S, Narayanan J, Tamilanban T, Subramaniyan V, Chitra V, Fuloria NK, et al. Exploring the contribution of pro-inflammatory cytokines to impaired wound healing in diabetes. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1216321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1216321

31. Jiang G, Jiang T, Chen J, Yao H, Mao R, Yang X, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in diabetic wound. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2023;37(7):e23407. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.23407

32. Bano U, Memon S, Shahani MY, Shaikh P, Gul S. Epigenetic effects of in utero bisphenol A administration: diabetogenic and atherogenic changes in mice offspring. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2019;22(5):521–528. https://doi.org/10.22038/ijbms.2019.29909.7357

33. Sen CK, Roy S, Khanna S. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy associated with foot ulcer: one of a kind. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2022.0093

34. An Y, Xu BT, Wan SR, Ma XM, Long Y, Xu Y, et al. The role of oxidative stress in diabetes mellitus-induced vascular endothelial dysfunction. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22(1):237. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-023-01965-7

35. Li X, Zou J, Lin A, Chi J, Hao H, Chen H, et al. Oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and N-acetylcysteine in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2024;40(16–18):968–989. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2023.0524

36. Dou B, Zhu Y, Sun M, Wang L, Tang Y, Tian S, et al. Mechanisms of flavonoids and their derivatives in endothelial dysfunction induced by oxidative stress in diabetes. Molecules. 2024;29(14):3265. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29143265

37. Memon SZ, Memon SH, Kazi S, Arain ZI, Memon AG, Hashmi SF. Frequency of hyperuricemia in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Prof Med J. 2020;27(2):284–288. https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2020.27.02.3500

38. Selim HM, Negm WA, Hawwal MF, Hussein IA, Elekhnawy E, Ulber R, et al. Fucoidan mitigates gastric ulcer injury through managing inflammation, oxidative stress, and NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023;120:110335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110335

39. Bang FS, Leeberg V, Ding M, Dreyer CH. The effect of VEGF stimulation in diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review. Wound Repair Regen. 2024;32(4):384–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.13171

40. Schönborn M, Łączak P, Pasieka P, Borys S, Płotek A, Maga P. Pro- and anti-angiogenic factors: their relevance in diabetic foot syndrome—a review. Angiology. 2022;73(4):299–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197211042684

41. Wan J, Bao Y, Hou LJ, Li GJ, Du LJ, Ma ZH, et al. lncRNA ANRIL accelerates wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers via modulating HIF1A/VEGFA signaling through interacting with FUS. J Gene Med. 2023;25(2):e3462. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgm.3462

42. Zhao Q, Xu J, Han X, Zhang Z, Qu J, Cheng Z. Growth differentiation factor 10 induces angiogenesis to promote wound healing in rats with diabetic foot ulcers by activating TGF-β1/Smad3 signaling pathway. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;13:1013018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1013018

43. Patel M, Patel V, Shah U, Patel A. Molecular pathology and therapeutics of the diabetic foot ulcer: comprehensive reviews. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2024;130(5):591–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/13813455.2023.2219863

Published

10-03-2026

How to Cite

Molecular Inflammatory, Oxidative Stress, and Angiogenic Pathways in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Pathogenesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis . (2026). Journal of Biomolecules, Pathogenesis and Therapeutics, 2(1). https://jbptjournal.org/index.php/jbpt/article/view/24

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

11-14 of 14

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.