CRISPR-Cas9–Mediated Engineering of Medicinal Plants for Enhanced Phytochemical Production: Advances in Biotechnology and Therapeutic Applications

Authors

  • Hira Aftab University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Aman Ullah University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan Author https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6310-1714
  • Shakir Ahmed Khan University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Habib Ullah University of Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68041/jbpt.v2i3/08

Keywords:

Alkaloids, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Flavonoids, Genetic Engineering, Metabolic Engineering, Plants, Medicinal, Terpenes

Abstract

The emergence of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing has now broadened the scope of precise modification of genes that play a role in biosynthesis of secondary metabolites in medicinal plants. Medicinal plants generate a variety of bioactive compounds, such as alkaloids, terpenoids, phenylpropanoids, and glucosinolates, and their biosynthesis is controlled by multifaceted pathways, often comprised of multiple genes, which could be targeted for manipulation. In this narrative review, 10 years of research about the use of CRISPR-Cas9 and other genome-editing technologies for phytochemical biosynthesis modification was discussed, and their potential for improving the production of therapeutically relevant metabolites in medicinal plants was also explored. The molecular targets examined comprise components of the methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway of terpenoids, of shikimate–phenylpropanoid pathway for flavonoids and lignans, the benzylisoquinoline alkaloid (BIA) pathway, and the mechanism of Cas9 gene-disruption and transcriptional regulation. Phytochemicals have been investigated and reported in their use in Hypericum perforatum (hypericin), Cannabis sativa (cannabinoids), Catharanthus roseus (vindoline and catharanthine), and Artemisia annua (artemisinin); the degree of experimental validation and demonstrated enhancement varies between compounds and plant systems. The review also highlighted the use of base and prime editing as a higher-order editing approach, multiplex editing for pathway and metabolic-flux modulation, and recently emerging applications of base and prime editing in plant metabolic engineering. The combination of CRISPR with the tools of synthetic biology and computational metabolic modelling, along with omics-guided pathway analysis, could be a key aid for the future development of precision-based phytochemical engineering and phytomedicine biotechnology.

Author Biographies

  • Hira Aftab, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

    School of Biochemistry and Biotechnology 

     

  • Aman Ullah, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

    Department of Pathology

  • Shakir Ahmed Khan, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

    School of Biochemistry and Biotechnology

     

  • Habib Ullah, University of Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan

    Department of Pathology

References

1. Atanasov AG, Zotchev SB, Dirsch VM, Supuran CT. Natural products in drug discovery: advances and opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20(3):200–216. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-020-00114-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-020-00114-z

2. Olivoto T, Nardino M, Carvalho IR, Follmann DN, Szareski VJ, Ferrari M, et al. Plant secondary metabolites and its dynamical systems of induction in response to environmental factors: A review. Afr J Agric Res. 2017;12(2):71-84. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2016.11677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2016.11677

3. Bonfill M, Mangas S, Moyano E, Cusidó RM, Palazón J. Production of centellosides and phytosterols in cell suspension cultures of Centella asiatica. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2011;104(1):61–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9804-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9804-7

4. Srinivasan P, Smolke CD. Biosynthesis of medicinal tropane alkaloids in yeast. Nature. 2020;585(7826):614–619. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2650-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2650-9

5. Pramanik D, Shelake RM, Kim MJ, Kim JY. CRISPR-mediated engineering across the central dogma in plant biology for basic research and crop improvement. Mol Plant. 2021;14(1):127–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.11.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.11.002

6. Anzalone AV, Koblan LW, Liu DR. Genome editing with CRISPR–Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(7):824-44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0561-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0561-9

7. Doudna JA, Charpentier E. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science. 2014;346(6213):1258096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258096

8. Hu JH, Miller SM, Geurts MH, Tang W, Chen L, Sun N, et al. Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity. Nature. 2018;556(7699):57–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature26155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature26155

9. Casini A, Olivieri M, Petris G, Montagna C, Reginato G, Maule G, et al. A highly specific SpCas9 variant is identified by in vivo screening in yeast. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(3):265–271. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4066

10. Shimatani Z, Kashojiya S, Takayama M, Terada R, Arazoe T, Ishii H, et al. Targeted base editing in rice and tomato using a CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(5):441–443. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3833 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3833

11. Lin Q, Zong Y, Xue C, Wang S, Jin S, Zhu Z, et al. Prime genome editing in rice and wheat. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(5):582–585. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0455-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0455-x

12. Lowder LG, Zhang D, Baltes NJ, Paul JW 3rd, Tang X, Zheng X, et al. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolbox for multiplexed plant genome editing and transcriptional regulation. Plant Physiol. 2015;169(2):971–985. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00636

13. Ahmad A, Munawar N, Khan Z, Qusmani AT, Khan SH, Jamil A, et al. An outlook on global regulatory landscape for genome-edited crops. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(21):11753. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111753 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111753

14. Altpeter F, Springer NM, Bartley LE, Blechl AE, Brutnell TP, Citovsky V, et al. Advancing crop transformation in the era of genome editing. Plant Cell. 2016;28(7):1510–1520. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00196 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00196

15. Maione F, Cicala C, Musciacco G, De Feo V, Amat AG, Ialenti A, et al. A review of natural products as leads to potential therapeutic agents. Nat Prod Commun. 2013;8(4):1934578X1300800434. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X130080043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X1300800434

16. Zhang Y, Liang Z, Zong Y, Wang Y, Liu J, Chen K, et al. Efficient and transgene-free genome editing in wheat through transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 DNA or RNA. Nat commun. 2016;7(1):12617. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12617 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12617

17. Liang Z, Chen K, Li T, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Zhao Q, et al. Efficient DNA-free genome editing of bread wheat using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):12617. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14261

18. Hesami M, Baiton A, Alizadeh M, Pepe M, Torkamaneh D, Jones AMP. Advances and perspectives in tissue culture and genetic engineering of cannabis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(11):5671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115671

19. Demirer GS, Zhang H, Matos JL, Goh NS, Cunningham FJ, Sung Y, et al. High aspect ratio nanomaterials enable delivery of functional genetic material without DNA integration in mature plants. Nat Nanotechnol. 2019;14(5):456–464. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0382-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0382-5

20. Lv Z, Jiang R, Chen J, Chen W. Nanoparticle‐mediated gene transformation strategies for plant genetic engineering. Plant J. 2020;104(4):880-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14973 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14973

21. Töpfer N, Fuchs LM, Aharoni A. The PhytoClust tool for metabolic gene clusters discovery in plant genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(12):7049–7063. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx404

22. Vranová E, Coman D, Gruissem W. Network analysis of the MVA and MEP pathways for isoprenoid synthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013;64:665–700. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120116

23. Sharma A, Shahzad B, Rehman A, Bhardwaj R, Landi M, Zheng B. Response of phenylpropanoid pathway and the role of polyphenols in plants under abiotic stress. Molecules. 2019;24(13):2452. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24132452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24132452

24. Wang Z, Yun Q, Hu J, Wei Z, Feng D, Li N, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of benzylisoquinoline alkaloid gene expression and co-expression networks during Papaver Somniferum developmental stages. Scientific Reports. 2025;15(1):27406. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11942-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11942-7

25. Rai A, Saito K, Yamazaki M. Integrated omics analysis of specialized metabolism in medicinal plants. Plant J. 2017;90(4):764–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13485

26. Miettinen K, Dong L, Navrot N, Schneider T, Burlat V, Pollier J, et al. The seco-iridoid pathway from Catharanthus roseus. Nat Commun. 2014;5(1):3606. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4606 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4606

27. González-Hernández RA, Valdez-Cruz NA, Macías-Rubalcava ML, Trujillo-Roldán MA. Overview of fungal terpene synthases and their regulation. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2023;39(7):194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-023-03635-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-023-03635-y

28. Schenke D, Cai D. Applications of CRISPR/Cas to improve crop disease resistance: beyond inactivation of susceptibility factors. iScience. 2020;23(9):101478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101478

29. Aghaali Z, Naghavi MR. Developing benzylisoquinoline alkaloid-enriched opium poppy via CRISPR-directed genome editing: A review. BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24(1):700. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05412-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05412-x

30. Dang TT, Chen X, Facchini PJ. Acetylation serves as a protective group in noscapine biosynthesis in opium poppy. Nat Chem Biol. 2015;11(2):104–106. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1717 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1717

31. Li C, Colinas M, Wood JC, Vaillancourt B, Hamilton JP, Jones SL, et al. Cell‐type‐aware regulatory landscapes governing monoterpene indole alkaloid biosynthesis in the medicinal plant Catharanthus roseus. New Phytol. 2025;245(1):347-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20208

32. Caputi L, Franke J, Farrow SC, Chung K, Payne RM, Nguyen TD, et al. Missing enzymes in the biosynthesis of the anticancer drug vinblastine in Madagascar periwinkle. Science. 2018;360(6394):1235-9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat4100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat4100

33. Tholl D. Terpene synthases and the regulation, diversity and biological roles of terpene metabolism. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006;9(3):297–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2006.03.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2006.03.014

34. Van der Fits L, Memelink J. ORCA3, a jasmonate-responsive transcriptional regulator of plant primary and secondary metabolism. Science. 2000;289(5477):295-7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5477.295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5477.295

35. Zeinali M, Sabzehzari M, Ménard D. A Systematic Review of Alternative Artemisinin Production Strategies. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(24):12095. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262412095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262412095

36. Wang H, Han J, Kanagarajan S, Lundgren A, Brodelius PE. Trichome-specific expression of the amorpha-4, 11-diene 12-hydroxylase (cyp71av1) gene, encoding a key enzyme of artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua, as reported by a promoter-GUS fusion. Plant Mol Biol. 2013;81(1):119-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-012-9986-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-012-9986-y

37. Vergara D, Huscher EL, Keepers KG, Cizek CG, Torres A, Gaudino R, et al. Gene copy number is associated with phytochemistry in Cannabis sativa. AoB Plants. 2019;11(1):plz074. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plz074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plz074

38. Matchett-Oates L, Braich S, Spangenberg GC, Rochfort S, Cogan NO. In silico analysis enabling informed design for genome editing in medicinal cannabis; gene families and variant characterisation. PLoS One. 2021;16(9):e0257413. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257413

39. Kochan E, Sienkiewicz M, Szmajda-Krygier D, Balcerczak E, Szymańska G. Carvacrol as a stimulant of the expression of key genes of the Ginsenoside Biosynthesis Pathway and its effect on the Production of Ginseng Saponins in Panax Quinquefolium Hairy Root cultures. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(2):909. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25020909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25020909

40. Choi HS, Koo HB, Jeon SW, Han JY, Kim JS, Jun KM, et al. Modification of ginsenoside saponin composition via the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of protopanaxadiol 6-hydroxylase gene in Panax ginseng. J Ginseng Res. 2022;46(4):505-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2021.06.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2021.06.004

41. Kirakosyan A, Sirvent TM, Gibson DM, Kaufman PB. The production of hypericins and hyperforin by in vitro cultures of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum). Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2004;39(1):71-81. https://doi.org/10.1042/BA20030144 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1042/BA20030144

42. Chen J, Liang C, He X, Huang J, Huang W, Huang A, et al. Advances in the Function Roles of Hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA Shikimate/Quinate Hydroxycinnamoyl Transferases: A Key Enzyme Linking Phenylpropanoid Metabolism to Plant Terrestrial Adaptation. Plants. 2026;15(8):1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15081162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15081162

43. Wang C, Wu C, Wang Y, Xie C, Shi M, Nile S, et al.Transcription factor OpWRKY3 is involved in the development and biosynthesis of camptothecin and its precursors in Ophiorrhiza pumila hairy roots. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(16):3996. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20163996 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20163996

44. Rabeh K, Hnini M, Oubohssaine M. A comprehensive review of transcription factor-mediated regulation of secondary metabolites in plants under environmental stress. Stress Biol. 2025;5(1):15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-024-00201-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-024-00201-w

45. Sun J, Christie A, Peebles M. Engineering overexpression of ORCA3 and strictosidine glucosidase in Catharanthus roseus hairy roots increases alkaloid production. Protoplasma. 2016;253(5):1255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-015-0881-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-015-0881-7

46. Schluttenhofer C, Yuan L. Regulation of specialized metabolism by WRKY transcription factors. Plant physiol. 2015;167(2):295-306. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.251769 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.251769

47. Xu F, Ning Y, Zhang W, Liao Y, Li L, Cheng H, et al. An R2R3-MYB transcription factor as a negative regulator of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway in Ginkgo biloba. Funct Integr Genomics. 2014;14(1):177-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-013-0352-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-013-0352-1

48. Lowder LG, Zhang D, Baltes NJ, Paul III JW, Tang X, Zheng X, et al. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolbox for multiplexed plant genome editing and transcriptional regulation. Plant physiol. 2015;169(2):971-85. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00636 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00636

49. Slaman E, Kottenhagen L, de Martines W, Angenent GC, de Maagd RA. Comparison of Cas12a and Cas9-mediated mutagenesis in tomato cells. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):4508. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55088-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55088-4

50. Xu Z, Wang G, Wang Q, Li X, Zhang G, Qurban A, et al. A near-complete genome assembly of Catharanthus roseus and insights into its vinblastine biosynthesis and high susceptibility to the Huanglongbing pathogen. Plant Commun. 2023;4(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100661

51. Shin H, Choi WL, Lim JY, Huh JH. Epigenome editing: targeted manipulation of epigenetic modifications in plants. Genes Genom. 2022;44(3):307-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-021-01199-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-021-01199-5

52. Kindermans JM, Pilloy J, Olliaro P, Gomes M. Ensuring sustained ACT production and reliable artemisinin supply. Malar J. 2007;6(1):125. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-6-125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-6-125

53. Paddon CJ, Keasling JD. Semi-synthetic artemisinin: a model for the use of synthetic biology in pharmaceutical development. Nat Rev Microbi. 2014;12(5):355-67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3240

54. Yin JY, Lai M, Yu XY, Su DD, Xiong XY, Li YL. Comprehensive strategies for paclitaxel production: insights from plant cell culture, endophytic microorganisms, and synthetic biology. Hortic Res. 2025;12(3):uhae346. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhae346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhae346

55. Devinsky O, Cross JH, Laux L, Marsh E, Miller I, Nabbout R, et al. Trial of cannabidiol for drug-resistant seizures in the Dravet syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(21):2011-20. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1611618 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1611618

56. Tjallinks G, Mattevi A, Fraaije MW. Biosynthetic strategies of berberine bridge enzyme-like flavoprotein oxidases toward structural diversification in natural product biosynthesis. Biochemistry. 2024;63(17):2089-110. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.4c00320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.4c00320

57. Matchett-Oates L, Braich S, Spangenberg GC, Rochfort S, Cogan NO. In silico analysis enabling informed design for genome editing in medicinal cannabis; gene families and variant characterisation. PLoS One. 2021;16(9):e0257413. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257413

58. Borah A, Singh S, Chattopadhyay R, Kaur J, Bari VK. Integration of CRISPR/Cas9 with multi-omics technologies to engineer secondary metabolite productions in medicinal plant: Challenges and Prospects. Funct Integr Genomics. 2024 Dec;24(6):207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-024-01486-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-024-01486-w

59. Guo M, Chen H, Dong S, Zhang Z, Luo H. CRISPR-Cas gene editing technology and its application prospect in medicinal plants. Chin Med. 2022;17(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-022-00584-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-022-00584-w

60. Ishii T, Araki M. Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing. Plant Cell Rep. 2017;36(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-016-1974-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-016-1974-2

Downloads

Published

20-09-2026

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): September

Section

Narrative Review

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Hira Aftab, Aman Ullah, Shakir Ahmed Khan, Habib Ullah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Journal of Biomolecules, Pathogenesis and Therapeutics (JBPT) follows the Attribution Creative Commons-Non commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license which allows the users to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform and build upon the material. The users must give credit to the source and indicate, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. However, the CC BY-NC 4.0 license restricts the use of material for commercial purposes (Further details are available at website. The Editorial Board of the JBPT endeavors to ensure the accuracy, integrity, and quality of all published content. However, the responsibility of opinions, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in the published articles rests entirely with the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editorial Board, publisher, or affiliated institutions.

How to Cite

CRISPR-Cas9–Mediated Engineering of Medicinal Plants for Enhanced Phytochemical Production: Advances in Biotechnology and Therapeutic Applications. (2026). Journal of Biomolecules, Pathogenesis and Therapeutics, 2(3), 148-155. https://doi.org/10.68041/jbpt.v2i3/08