Dual Mitochondrial Dependencies in Cancer: OXPHOS and Fatty Acid Oxidation Pathways in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Pancreatic Cancer; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors

  • Mahnoor Khan Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan Author https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4782-5248
  • Adil Kaleem Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Abu Bakar Rehman Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68041/jbpt.v2i3/07

Keywords:

Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Metabolic Reprogramming, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Oxidative Phosphorylation, Pancreatic Neoplasms

Abstract

Background: Mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming by Oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and Fatty acid oxidation (FAO) has become survival and therapy-resistance driver in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This review aimed to evaluate the role of OXPHOS and FAO pathways in cancers and potential as therapeutic targets. Methods: The research was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched from January 2013 to December 2025. Articles with data on effect of pharmacological or genetic inhibition of OXPHOS and FAO in AML and PDAC were considered. Reviews, case reports, and non-English articles were excluded. The SYRCLE and OHAT tools were used to determine the risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence was determined using GRADE. MetaAnalysisOnline Tool was used for statistical analysis. Results: Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria. Studies included in AML assessed OXPHOS (SMD = -0.76, 95% CI: -3.18 to -1.67, p= 0.05) and FAO (SMD = -0.19, 95% CI: -7.31 to -6.93, p> 0.05) showed no significant differences and high heterogeneity (I2 > 94%). In PDAC, four studies provided data on OXPHOS (SMD = -5.27, 95% CI: -15.59 to -5.05, p .05) and four on FAO (SMD = -215.42, 95% CI: -616.27 to -185.44, p>0.05) and high heterogeneity (I² > 95%). The overall risk of bias was low to moderate, and certainty of evidence was moderate. Conclusion: In cancer cells, AML, and PDAC, OXPHOS and FAO were parallel dependent pathways, making mitochondrial metabolism a promising target therapy.

 

Author Biographies

  • Mahnoor Khan, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan

    Department of Allied Health Sciences

  • Adil Kaleem, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan

    Department of Allied Health Sciences

  • Abu Bakar Rehman, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan

    Department of Allied Health Sciences

References

1. Vyas S, Zaganjor E, Haigis MC. Mitochondria and Cancer. Cell. 2016;166(3):555-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.002

2. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013

3. Padinharayil H, Rai V, George A. Mitochondrial Metabolism in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: From Mechanism-Based Perspectives to Therapy. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(4):1070. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041070

4. Jones CL, Stevens BM, D'Alessandro A, Reisz JA, Culp-Hill R, Nemkov T, et al. Inhibition of Amino Acid Metabolism Selectively Targets Human Leukemia Stem Cells. Cancer Cell. 2018;34(5):724-740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2018.10.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2018.10.005

5. Ye H, Adane B, Khan N, Sullivan T, Minhajuddin M, Gasparetto M, et al. Leukemic Stem Cells Evade Chemotherapy by Metabolic Adaptation to an Adipose Tissue Niche. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;19(1):23-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2016.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2016.06.001

6. Griessinger E, Pereira-Martins D, Nebout M, Bosc C, Saland E, Boet E, et al. Oxidative Phosphorylation Fueled by Fatty Acid Oxidation Sensitizes Leukemic Stem Cells to Cold. Cancer Res. 2023;83(15):2461-2470. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-1006

7. Sancho P, Burgos-Ramos E, Tavera A, Bou Kheir T, Jagust P, Schoenhals M, et al. MYC/PGC-1α Balance Determines the Metabolic Phenotype and Plasticity of Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells. Cell Metab. 2015;22(4):590-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.08.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.08.015

8. Valle S, Alcalá S, Martin-Hijano L, Cabezas-Sáinz P, Navarro D, Muñoz ER, et al. Exploiting oxidative phosphorylation to promote the stem and immunoevasive properties of pancreatic cancer stem cells. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5265. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18954-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18954-z

9. Reyes-Castellanos G, Masoud R, Carrier A. Mitochondrial Metabolism in PDAC: From Better Knowledge to New Targeting Strategies. Biomedicines. 2020;8(8):270. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8080270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8080270

10. De Beauchamp L, Himonas E, Helgason GV. Mitochondrial metabolism as a potential therapeutic target in myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia. 2022;36(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-021-01416-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-021-01416-w

11. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLos Med. 2021;18(3):e1003583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583

12. Hooijmans CR, Rovers MM, de Vries RBM, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Langendam MW. SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(2):43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-43

13. National Toxicology Program. OHAT risk of bias rating tool for human and animal studies. National Toxicology Program: Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. 2015. Available at: https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/ohat/pubs/riskofbiastool_508.pdf

14. Fekete JT, Győrffy B. MetaAnalysisOnline.com: Web-Based Tool for the Rapid Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Epidemiological Studies. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27(1):e64016. https://doi.org/10.2196/64016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/64016

15. Pollyea, DA, Stevens BM, Jones CL, Winters A, Pei S, Minhajuddin M, et al. Venetoclax with azacitidine disrupts energy metabolism and targets leukemia stem cells in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Med. 2018;24(12):1859-1866. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0233-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0233-1

16. Lagadinou ED, Sach A, Callahan K, Rossi RM, Neering SJ, Minhajuddin M, et al. BCL-2 inhibition targets oxidative phosphorylation and selectively eradicates quiescent human leukemia stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12(3):329-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.12.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.12.013

17. Yang H, Tabe Y, Sekihara K, Saito K, Ma H, Ruvolo V, et al. Novel oxidative phosphorylation inhibitor IACS-010759 induces AMPK-dependent apoptosis of AML cells. Blood. 2017;130(1): 1245. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V130.Suppl_1.1245.1245

18. Banella C, Catalano G, Travaglini S, Pelosi E, Ottone T, Zaza A, et al. Ascorbate Plus Buformin in AML: A Metabolic Targeted Treatment. Cancers. 2022; 14(10):2565. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14102565 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14102565

19. Yang Y, Parfenova E, Vrdoljak N, Minden M, Luc J, Doxey AC, et al. Pharmacological inhibition of Peroxisome Proliferation-Activated Receptor Delta (PPARδ) imparts selective leukemia cell death. Cancer Metab. 2025;13(1):36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40170-025-00402-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40170-025-00402-5

20. Farge T, Saland E, de Toni F, Aroua N, Hosseini M, Perry R, et al. Chemotherapy-Resistant Human Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells Are Not Enriched for Leukemic Stem Cells but Require Oxidative Metabolism. Cancer Discov. 2017;7(7):716-735. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0441

21. Tcheng M, Minden MD, Spagnuolo PA. Avocado-derived avocadyne is a potent inhibitor of fatty acid oxidation. J Food Biochem. 2022;46(3):e13895. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.13895 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.13895

22. Tabe Y, Saitoh K, Yang H, Sekihara K, Yamatani K, Ruvolo V, et al. Inhibition of FAO in AML co-cultured with BM adipocytes: mechanisms of survival and chemosensitization to cytarabine. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):16837. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35198-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35198-6

23. Yu M, Nguyen ND, Huang Y, Lin D, Fujimoto TN, Molkentine J, et al. Mitochondrial fusion exploits a therapeutic vulnerability of pancreatic cancer. JCI Insight. 2019;5(16):e126915. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.126915 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.126915

24. Xue D, Xu Y, Kyani A, Roy J, Dai L, Sun D, et al. Multiparameter Optimization of Oxidative Phosphorylation Inhibitors for the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer. J Med Chem. 2022;65(4):3404-3419. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01934

25. Wang Q, Li M, Gan Y, Jiang S, Qiao J, Zhang W, et al. Mitochondrial Protein UQCRC1 is Oncogenic and a Potential Therapeutic Target for Pancreatic Cancer. Theranostics. 2020;10(5):2141-2157. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.38704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.38704

26. Dash S, Ueda T, Komuro A, Honda M, Sugisawa R, Okada H. Deoxycytidine kinase inactivation enhances gemcitabine resistance and sensitizes mitochondrial metabolism interference in pancreatic cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2024;15(2):131. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-024-06531-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-024-06531-x

27. Woo SM, Lee H, Kang JH, Kang M, Choi W, Sim SH, et al. Loss of SLC25A20 in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Reversed the Tumor-Promoting Effects of a High-Fat Diet. Theranostics. 2025;15(13):6516-6533. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.114912 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.114912

28. Sharma H, Mondal S, Urquiza U, Esparza C, Bartlett S, Santa-Pinter L, et al. Synthesis and biological characterization of an orally bioavailable lactate dehydrogenase-A inhibitor against pancreatic cancer. Eur J Med Chem. 2024;275(1):116598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2024.116598 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2024.116598

29. Shinoda S, Nakamura N, Inoko K, Sato-Dahlman M, Carmella S, HechtS, et al. Inhibition of fatty acid binding protein suppresses pancreatic cancer progression and metastasis. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):26084. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11271-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11271-9

30. Lee JS, Oh SJ, Choi HJ, Kang JH, Lee SH, Ha JS, et al. ATP Production Relies on Fatty Acid Oxidation Rather than Glycolysis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(9):2477. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092477 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092477

31. Panuzzo C, Jovanovski A, Pergolizzi B, Pironi L, Stanga S, Fava C, et al. Mitochondria: A Galaxy in the Hematopoietic and Leukemic Stem Cell Universe. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(11):3928. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113928

32. Griessinger E, Pereira-Martins D, Nebout M, Bosc C, Saland E, Boet E, et al. Oxidative Phosphorylation Fueled by Fatty Acid Oxidation Sensitizes Leukemic Stem Cells to Cold. Cancer Res. 2023;83(15):2461-2470. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-1006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-1006

33. Padinharayil H, Rai V, George A. Mitochondrial Metabolism in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: From Mechanism-Based Perspectives to Therapy. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(4):1070. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041070

34. Samudio I, Harmancey R, Fiegl M, Kantarjian H, Konopleva M, Korchin B, et al. Pharmacologic inhibition of fatty acid oxidation sensitizes human leukemia cells to apoptosis induction. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(1):142-156. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI38942 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI38942

35. Viale A, Pettazzoni P, Lyssiotis CA, Ying H, Sánchez N, Marchesini M, et al. Oncogene ablation-resistant pancreatic cancer cells depend on mitochondrial function. Nature. 2014;514(7524):628-632. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13611 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13611

36. Halbrook CJ, Lyssiotis CA. Employing Metabolism to Improve the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Cell. 2017;31(1):5-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2016.12.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2016.12.006

37. Jia D, Park JH, Jung KH, Levine H, Kaipparettu BA. Elucidating the Metabolic Plasticity of Cancer: Mitochondrial Reprogramming and Hybrid Metabolic States. Cells. 2018;7(3):21. 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells7030021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells7030021

38. Fendt SM, Frezza C, Erez A. Targeting Metabolic Plasticity and Flexibility Dynamics for Cancer Therapy. Cancer Discov. 2020;10(12):1797-1807. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0844 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0844

39. Pavlova NN, Thompson CB. The Emerging Hallmarks of Cancer Metabolism. Cell Metab. 2016;23(1):27-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.12.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.12.006

40. Faubert B, Solmonson A, DeBerardinis RJ. Metabolic reprogramming and cancer progression. Science. 2020;368(6487):eaaw5473. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw5473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw5473

Downloads

Published

20-09-2026

Issue

Section

Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

How to Cite

Dual Mitochondrial Dependencies in Cancer: OXPHOS and Fatty Acid Oxidation Pathways in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Pancreatic Cancer; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2026). Journal of Biomolecules, Pathogenesis and Therapeutics, 2(3), 138-147. https://doi.org/10.68041/jbpt.v2i3/07